Dear Friends (actually &
potentially) of THE SEED CATALOG,
I always intend this publication to be a communal letter
from one heart to another, although there exists, in many
cases, no history of personal contact, other than these
occasional mailings. Terry Porter, of Video Renaissance
fame, has called it "mail art," and I do thank him
profoundly for that!
Receptivity is hoped for, but never assumed. My conceptions
and conversations are mostly internal ruminations, offered
freely for any who may wish to tune in. At present I am
digging into my own ancient past as an alleged purveyor of
truth, seeing what I can put together as an interesting
blend of once upon a time "pontifications" and current
realizations. For instance, on the opposite side of this
page, the synopsis of a sermon I was invited to present in
1980 at the Congregational United Church of Christ here in
Sarasota.
In our time of chaotic, destructive theological distortions,
it seems relevant to critically analyze the original sins of
some highly revered founding fathers of major faith
communities, like Jonathan Edwards, Martin
Luther, and even Father Abraham
himself, whose interpretations have often been less than
helpful in contributing to human well-being and
self-understanding. So I hope you will consider the work of
such scholars as Erich Fromm (ESCAPE FROM FREEDOM), Bruce
Bawer (STEALING JESUS), and Bruce Chilton (ABRAHAM'S CURSE)
in the context of today' s religious confusion.
|
|
Escape
from Freedom
---ERICH FROMM page 81
Luther's relationship to Cod was one
of complete submission. In psychological terms his concept
of faith means: if you completely submit, if you accept your
individual insignificance, then the all-powerful Cod may be
willing to love you and save you. If you get rid of your
individual self with all its shortcomings and doubts by
utmost self-effacement, you free yourself from the feeling
of your own nothingness and can participate in God's glory.
Thus. while Luther freed people from the authority .of the
Church, he made them submit to a much more tyrannical
authority, that of a Cod who insisted on complete submission
of man and annihilation of the individual self as the
essential condition to his salvation. Luther's "faith" was'
the conviction of being loved upon the condition of
surrender, a solution which has much in common with the
principle of complete submission of the individual to the
state and the "leader."
|
Love is rising from the
dead; and blooming everywhere.
|
|
|
|
|
|
A SUFFERING GOD IN THE HANDS OF
AN ANGRY MOB
Seeds of a Sermon delivered In Sarasota
at
First Congregational (UCC) on Sunday, June 22, 1980
WiIIiam
T. Joyner \ Bachelor of Divinity
"The God that
holds you over the pit of hell, much as one
holds a spider, or some loathsome insect over
the fire, abhors you, and is dreadfully
provoked: his wrath towards you burns like fire;
he looks upon you as worthy of nothing else, but
to be cast into the fire; he is of purer eyes
than to bear to have you in his sight; you are
ten thousand times more abominable in his eyes,
than the most hateful venomous serpent is in
ours."
__ JONATHON
EDWARDS
In his classic
sermon
of the late
1700's "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God"
|
The study of divinity is not a very precise one.
Almost everyone has their own version of the
deity, and very often the version most
authoritatively expressed is the one most
respected and believed, because "We want a
strong leader!" One that Is all wise, like The
Wizard of Oz; one who will build better bridges,
like Mussolini one who will always be right and
who will always have the right answer to
everything! Jonathon Edwards is a case In'
point. His vision of the human race "through the
eyes of God" was not poorly received. It was
crucial to the popular mass evangelism of the
late 1700's called "The Great Awakening," a real
hang-over from medieval religion, which,
although it might have in some sense purged the
population of demons, surely had the effect of
creating a lot of bad press for God, not to
mention ourselves. But what would you expect
from someone who would hold spiders over a fire
because they are" loathsome"? I n short, we can
all be thankful that Jonathon Edwards is not
God!
Why is it that "the end of the world" seems to
have a great appeal for some of us who are
deeply into religion? What joy is there in a
rapture wherein God sweeps away all the "decent
folks" into a heaven of bliss while others with
whom God is less impressed because they couldn't
get their theology together and recite "the
right answers" are consigned to hell? Maybe we
are trying to cast the Almighty in our own mold.
Maybe we are projecting some of our own anger
upon a God who, In my reading of the scriptures,
is
a suffering God, an unrequited Lover, one who
turns to us as we stand in the angry mob
screaming "Crucify!" and says with the
gentleness of the Lover that he is, "It's all
right. I forgive you. I'll step aside and let
you have your way, because I value and respect
your integrity and your freedom that much. I
love you that much." "Father, forgive them, they
know not what they do," is the eternal
expression of a divine commitment
to the human enterprise. It Is an expression of
the nature of a suffering God who yet weeps over
Jerusalem as a mother or a father weeps over
the.
plight of their children
We seem to have some problem relating to a
suffering God, as depicted in Isaiah 53: "He was
despised and rejected by men, a man of sorrows
and acquainted with grief." We seem to desire
always a militant messiah, an angry God, perhaps
really because we are so angry, so frustrated at
having to deal with a situation that seems
beyond the control of everyone.
But God suffers our growth, allowing us the
freedom we must have to resolve our differences
and to "come of age" as the Body and Being of
God here and now. Love demands that we take
control of ourselves and of the world, rather
than resign ourselves to the apocalypse. And in
order
to take control, we must suffer ourselves to be
a part of the family.
|
|
My
favorite saints tend to be ones who never were
officially sanctioned as such. Corita Kent, for
instance, who, when interviewed following her
departure fro~ the sisterhood of her faith by
someone who said she sounded like a Unitarian,
affirmed that she no longer had any relationship
with organized religion. And even Mother Teresa;
after all of her saintly services to the poor
and dying, has to wait for official recognition
as a saint until it can be proved that she
performed a "miracle." Soren Kierkegaard wanted
to be a minister, but he didn't qualify. Nikos
Kazantzakis came within a hair of being
excommunicated from the Eastern Orthodox system
for such profound works as The Last Temptation
of Christ, and the list could go on and on. The
saintly acts of creation by such individuals,
nevertheless, testify to their enduring
validity. And let's be fair to established
religion; it has nurtured and sustained true
saints and reformers within its strictures and
structures. Look at what Andy Warhol meant when
he said, "I go to church. It's so pretty." And
don't forget Alan Watts' eternally sage advice,
that " ... when you know that you don't need to
have a religion at all, it can be fun to have
one."
So whether
you're in or out, or half-way, "keep the faith."
- Bill Joyner
|
|
Leonard
Cohen is a saint to me, and I love his description
of what one might be:
"A saint'is someone
who has achieved
a remote human
possibility ...
"I think it has
something to do
with the energy
of love.
"It is a kind of balance
that is his glory.
He rides the drifts
like an escaped ski.
His course is
a caress of the hill ...
Something in him
so loves the world
that he gives himself
to the laws of
gravity and
chance."
- Leonard Cohen
|
|
So ... love abide[s]. (I Corinthians
13: 13)
Yes, God be praised, love abides! Whatever the world takes
away from you, though it be the most cherished, whatever
happens to you in life, however you may have to suffer
because of your striving, for the good, if you please, if
men turn indifferent from you or as enemies against you, if
no one is willing to admit acquaintance with you or
acknowledge what he nevertheless owes to you, if even your
best friend should deny you-if nevertheless in any of your
strivings, in any of your actions, in any of your words you
truly have consciously had love along: then take comfort,
for love abides. - Kierkegaard
|
Corita Kent
SURVIVING
WITH STYLE
URBAN GUERRILLA WITH PAINT
BRUSH
When
Corita Kent died here in Boston last month, the first. thing
I thought of was a splendid evening we . , shared sometime
around 1970 which we called "A Peace of Bread" The title, of
course, was one of her puns. We invited lots of people -
many hundreds came to a gathering for song, poetry, art, and
the sharing of bread, all as a celebration of life and a
protest against the war in Vietnam.
It was a
great evening. Micki Myers, Corita's talented young
protge, had done a lot of the preparation. The lighting
was c1assicallate-sixties. The mood was upbeat. People
obviously wanted to say and do something positive and
affirming, not just continue to say "no" to the war. It was
also the time when the vague oriental wave had already
crested and many young people were looking to Christianity
again.
Dan
Berrigan was there, reading his poetry, 14 garland of
carnations and daisies around his neck. Judy Collins,
Corita's friend, threw back her head and sang a couple of
her best songs, including - as I recall - "Clouds." I was a
sort of master of ceremonies. But the high point was Corita.
High because it was so low profile, so unassuming, so
matter-offact. She simply showed some slides and talked
about a disturbed and painfully shy little girl she had
helped to lead out of her pain and withdrawal by teaching
her ho~ to draw a large sunflower. She ended by saying
something which, when I write it down now, sounds hopelessly
trite. But when she said it that night it was anything but
ordinary. I forget the exact words, but it had to do with
bringing out - into visibility and color and texture
and light - the flower Inside each of us.
Why is it
that I forget almost everything about the rest of that
evening, but ( remember Corita - small, fragile, earnest,
speaking almost shyly about something which, at least on the
surface seemed to have little to do with the bombing of
Hanoi? |
|
I think
it is because Corita had a complex kind of simplicity.
She
combined a childlike innocence with the kind of wisdom one
finds more often among very old women. She mixed being
serene with being high-strung. Above all, she had a certain
indefatigable resiliency. She was a fighter who not only
survived the scarring battles the Immaculate Heart Sisters
lived through but did it with verve. Of all her slogan
posters I think I like "Survival with Style" the best.
That's who Corita was, a survivor with style.
Corita
Kent also won my heart because she had an urban sensibility.
She loved the City. She reveled in the junk and handouts and
throwaways and labels and ads that most people experience
merely as a suffocating wave of mind-deadening trivia. For
her they provided the endlessly fascinating material for her
lively and playful art. In this sense Corita was profoundly
sacramental and very, very "Catholic." The world of signs
and sales slogans and plastic containers was not, for her,
an empty wasteland. It was the dough out of which she baked
the bread of life. Like a priest, a shaman, a magician, she
could pass her hands over the commonest of the everyday, the
superficial, the oh-so-ordinary, and make it a vehicle of
the luminous. the only, and the hope-filled.
Every
time I drive to the Cape I go by the huge oil storage tank
she splashed with her famous, colossal squiggly daubs.
There
they are, assertively antic, endlessly making gentle fun of
the bizarrely inappropriate structure they are splashed
over. When I see them I always smile. No matter how
horrendous the traffic is on the Southeast Expressway, no
matter how bad a day it has been, my spirits are always
lifted. For Corita "art" did not belong under glass.
Art meant transforming even the ugliest parts of the urban
environment into testimonies of joy. She was an urban
guerrilla with a paint brush.
I have
not driven by that tank since Corita died. The next time I
do I know I'll feel a stab of sadness. There are so many
girders and stanchions and dreary warehouses and pipelines
that still invite her magic touch. She's gone now. But I
hope somewhere little girls and boys are letting the flowers
within come out, and some adults are remembering that even
something as banal as Wonderbread can taste great if
you know how to serve it up.
Corita
did not survive her last battle, but she lived - and died -
with style. For that I'll always be thankful..
HARVEY
COX
(Harvey
Cox teaches at Harvard Divinity School. His most recent book
is Religion in the Secular City, published by Simon &
Schuster.)
Commonweal: 550
1986
|
|
|